Currently the only way to revoke a access token / refresh tokens is to ether for the user to remove the oauth app from they account or a oauth app to delete the app itself witch also revoke all tokens. If you have a access token leaked within the app you would need to revoke everything even if just one token was compromised. With the RFC 7009 it's a own spec ontop off the oauth2 spec that adds in a endpoint that allow to revoke just one token.

You also have the problem with client side apps that use implicit tokens. When the app/site ask to generate a implicit this token is valid for a year. If the user then want to logout off this site this token is still valid and often just deleted from the cookie / local storage. This open up for that a token that shuld have been revoked when the user told to "logout" is still valid and if someone catpured this token it's free to use whiout anyone knowing.

There are more info about this at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7009
Other big API's like google has this.

Today's Mixer Android/iOS app update disables FTL by default, which will cause serious problems for any MixPlay games that depend on a low latency stream.

Our main MixPlay game will now become unplayable for anyone on mobile, unless they've re-enabled FTL. Obviously we'll be telling people to enable it, but there's likely to be a large amount of player churn with people thinking "well, this thing sucks" and dropping out before they realise it's because FTL is disabled.

Whilst the logic for having FTL disabled by default on mobile is understandable (and probably even preferable for non-interactive streams), it would be very helpful if developers could set a "requires FTL" flag on their MixPlay projects that either automatically enables FTL when a viewer loads the stream, or shows a warning dialog ("This interactive stream may not work properly with FTL disabled. Would you like to enable FTL [Yes|No]").

you host a big disadvantage bonus you host a small advantage stream bonus because if not the small streamer is small eternally yA not respect between the small and big streamer

Nov 18, 13:54 PST

If you implement a program for example if a big streamer host of the little streamer gives him a bonus because these beautiful play play streamer jaj acumulate 338 subscribe in 2 months my spend my life tense if the big help us his sa would be faster sponsorship style

Then there is the chain paladinsgame ninja ship rubyann jared breesenpai my ban for asking them to sputain me with a follow majs i pay a subscription by us we apel his fraud a subscription that you do not access then for his he should have sanctions to the streamer if he banishes the spectator just for fun thank you for following me

------ Additional Info ------
Channel: https://mixer.com/newCHANELgam

So, say you're streaming and you hit a clip live on stream but you don't want to go back and search for it. There should be a way where you can edit clips straight from the stream to upload when you're done. Yes, it does sound similar but it's definitely different. So say you clip a few cool things in a few separate times and you don't want to go back looking through things to edit them, you should be able to do it on the go while you're streaming. Then once you're finished streaming you can upload them straight to your social media platform like a streaming montage. I don't know for sure but just a thought. It could be called like "MixerGo" for like montages on the go.